The IAS 7 Cash Flow Cover-Up: How “Operating Cash” Hid a $45 Million Problem

A tech company boasted about strong operating cash flows for three years straight. Then someone noticed their footnotes: They’d classified customer loan repayments as operating activities. When corrected, operating cash turned deeply negative. The CFO “resigned” within a week.

The Classification Con Game

Three buckets seem simple: Operating, Investing, Financing. But IAS 7’s flexibility is where manipulation lives:

  • Interest paid: Operating or financing?
  • Dividends received: Operating or investing?
  • Taxes: Split or allocate?

The flexibility abuse: A struggling retailer showed positive operating cash by:

  • Putting interest paid in financing (not operating)
  • Calling asset sales “operating” (actually investing)
  • Moving supplier financing to investing (it’s operating) Real operating cash: Negative $30 million for two years.

The Cash Equivalent Trap

What’s a “cash equivalent”? IAS 7 says: Original maturity of three months or less. Seems clear? Think again.

The maturity manipulation: Company bought 6-month bonds, held for 2.5 months, called them cash equivalents. “They mature in under 3 months!” Auditors: “Original maturity matters.” Impact: $50 million moved from cash to investments. Liquidity ratios destroyed.

The Gross vs. Net Nightmare

When can you net cash flows? Almost never. IAS 7 demands gross presentation except for:

  • Quick turnover items
  • Large amounts
  • Short maturities

The netting disaster: A bank netted all customer deposits and withdrawals. “It’s quick turnover!” They showed $10 million net deposits. Reality: $500 million in deposits, $490 million in withdrawals. Massive customer exodus hidden by netting.

The Foreign Currency Fiasco

Exchange differences on cash: Not a cash flow! But they affect cash balances. Where do they go?

The reconciliation wreck: Multinational showed:

  • Opening cash: $100 million
  • Operating cash: $50 million
  • Closing cash: $120 million
  • Missing: $30 million exchange loss hidden in operating activities When separated, operating cash was actually $20 million, not $50 million.

The Non-Cash Transaction Trap

Bought assets with shares? Converted debt to equity? These need disclosure but NOT in the cash flow statement.

The hidden leverage: Company showed zero investing outflows while growing rapidly. Secret: All acquisitions used vendor financing and share swaps. $200 million in effective cash commitments hidden from cash flow statement. Separate disclosure buried in note 47.

Your Takeaway as an Accountant

Create a classification checklist for every unusual transaction. Document why you chose operating/investing/financing. Be consistent—changing classification screams manipulation. Review bank overdrafts carefully—they might not be cash equivalents.

Most importantly: If you’re classifying to make cash flows look better, you’re doing it wrong. Cash flow statements should reveal truth, not hide it.

Build bulletproof cash flow statements with ACCOUNTANT MINDSET—where transparency beats creativity every time.

Share

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top